From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 23 16:35:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12967 for current-outgoing; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 16:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12948 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 16:34:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod.dataplex.net [208.2.87.4]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA21690; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 18:34:40 -0600 (CST) X-Sender: rkw@shrimp.dataplex.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <19970323232413.DQ50069@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: ; from Richard Wackerbarth on Mar 23, 1997 15:12:54 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 18:33:27 -0600 To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: CTM? Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 4:24 PM -0600 3/23/97, J Wunsch wrote: >As Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > >> We need to arrange to have published a list of sites that archive the >> various ctm distributions. With the generation of all the ctm >> distributions, I simply do not have the resources to also be a public >> repository of them. However, I will be happy to assist any public archiver >> in obtaining any missing pieces. > >What's wrong with freefall? Nothing if they are willing. I got them to handle 2.1 & 2.2 when I added those services. The others were already existing and I had nothing to do with their arrangements.