Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 10:27:19 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> Cc: developers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmgr duties expand Message-ID: <200111181727.fAIHRJ762716@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:43:52 GMT." <688520000.1006087432@lobster.originative.co.uk> References: <688520000.1006087432@lobster.originative.co.uk> <200111180201.fAI21j757358@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <688520000.1006087432@lobster.originative.co.uk> Paul Richards writes: : Will committers approved by the postmgr team be restricted to working in : the ports tree or will they have free reign as other committers do? : : What's the process for becoming a src or docs committer if you were : originally approved by portsmgr and not by core? Right now committers approved as ports committers are supposed to only commit to the ports tree. This doesn't change that. If they want to be src committers, we currently ask that they get approval for that and find a src committer to be a mentor. Likewise going the other way (from src -> ports), although the other way is less enforced. This was true when asami-san was approving ports committers, as well as when core took this over recently before conferring it unto portmgr. doc is a special case, since it has its fingers into the src tree in ways that aren't easy to extricate. There's not currently a technical enforcement for this in place. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111181727.fAIHRJ762716>