From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Nov 4 04:02:46 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA11308 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 04:02:46 -0800 Received: from stills.pubnix.net (Stills.pubnix.net [192.172.250.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA11300 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 04:02:43 -0800 Received: (from uguard@localhost) by stills.pubnix.net (8.6.11/8.6.12) with UUCP id HAA25592; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 07:02:39 -0500 Received: (from andrew@localhost) by guardian.fortress.org (8.6.11/8.6.9) id HAA28779; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 07:05:49 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 1995 07:05:48 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Webster Reply-To: captain@pubnix.net To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HELP: Lost routes!? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > If you look at -current in net/route.c:rtrequest(), there is some code > > (and a big comment) below the `makeroute' label which attempts to > > handle this case. It should patch cleanly into your system. OOPS, sorry about the comment that it wasn't fixed, I mistakenly thought that the latest SNAP was built from -current. I did get route.c from -current and have applied the patch, now I just have to wait and see if the problem goes away for good! Regards, Andrew Webster - captain@pubnix.net - http://www.pubnix.net PubNIX Montreal - Connected to the world - Branche au monde 514-990-5911 - P.O. Box 147, Cote St-Luc, Quebec, H4V 2Y3