From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 13 05:50:13 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ECE37B401
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net
	[205.152.59.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03D243FCB
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from 2m5mefx02@sneakemail.com)
Received: from vwinxp.sneakemail.com ([66.156.91.208])
	by imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.netESMTP
	<20030813125012.QPFX4876.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@vwinxp.sneakemail.com>
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:50:12 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030813084614.0195ff40@threespace.com>
X-Sender: tech@threespace.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:50:30 -0400
To: FreeBSD Chat <chat@freebsd.org>
From: Chip Morton <2m5mefx02@sneakemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F39DB0B.626A0457@mindspring.com>
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030811133518.66226B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
 <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030811133518.66226B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
 <4.3.2.7.2.20030812103946.01a5f008@threespace.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:09.signal
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:50:14 -0000

At 02:30 AM 8/13/2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
>So... how much SPAM will need to be sent from behind your NAT,
>making it look like it's you who's SPAM'ming, before you close
>the thing down?

It would take enough spam to get a complaint sent to my ISP (whoever that 
is) which makes them take action against me.  Until then, I'll take my chances.

But honestly, I can't imagine that anybody serious about sending spam is 
waiting for somebody in this area to set up an open wireless network to 
wreak havoc.  It just seems like a low probability event.