From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 03:56:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3014EDDA for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 03:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049DA255 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 03:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-24-8-230-52.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.230.52] helo=damnhippie.dyndns.org) by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJzE-000NYz-Th; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 03:56:17 +0000 Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s233uEXd046129; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:56:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 24.8.230.52 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/J06I05UAk0DfD8u/Dg+ni Subject: Re: TMPFS in kernels From: Ian Lepore To: George Rosamond In-Reply-To: <5313D0FE.8010008@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <5313D0FE.8010008@ceetonetechnology.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:56:14 -0700 Message-ID: <1393818974.1149.270.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 03:56:18 -0000 On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 19:46 -0500, George Rosamond wrote: > Is there a reason why TMPFS(5) is not in the 10-Stable's ALIX and RPI-B > kernels, yet in BEAGLEBONE? Haven't checked the others. > > Seems like a strong and mature replacement for md(4) from my > experiences, and probably belongs in the Crochet fstabs. I have been > using on Alix, RPis, x86 for a long while, and never had any > (noticeable) issues. > > g I agree. Should we add it to all configs, or just to armv6 configs? -- Ian