Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:37:22 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD Ports List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Dealing with options in dependent ports Message-ID: <20121130183722.GB81236@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJp7RHZ8=P%2ByO8MO2%2BQfjueRnKXDyX=5u2-8=TWEQ0FyMqWOrQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <A9F2CA034E76DB10EB615B3B@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> <20121130154740.GA16360@graf.pompo.net> <CAJp7RHZ8=P%2ByO8MO2%2BQfjueRnKXDyX=5u2-8=TWEQ0FyMqWOrQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le ven 30 nov 12 à 19:07:20 +0100, Alberto Villa <avilla@FreeBSD.org> écrivait : > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Thierry Thomas <thierry@freebsd.org> wrote: > > However, to enforce the right dependency, this option have to produce a > > different plist. > > Really? Isn't enough to depend on the package name instead of a file? xxx_DEPENDS= specific_file:slave_ports -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121130183722.GB81236>