From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 19 10:18:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from minubian.houabg.com (minubian.houabg.com [206.109.247.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92489152B2 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 10:18:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dchapman@houabg.com) Received: from houcbs2.houabg.com (HOUABG.COM [206.109.247.20]) by minubian.houabg.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA19191 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:30:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dchapman@houabg.com) Received: from sdn-ar-002txhousP035.dialsprint.net by houcbs2.houabg.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1457.7) id GWAQK282; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:27:15 -0600 Message-ID: <001e01be7235$3a7f3180$0300a8c0@dwcjr.houabg.com> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Subject: Re: Confusion Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:20:54 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When windows 98 came out they didn't say this version is less stable than the previous, or that the networking still has a way to go. You even have to dig very hard and know some people to find out that their excuse for a crappy networking structure is that it was designed for windows 2000. If using a release cost you your job due to some problems, then you deserve that fait. Even with any other operating system you don't use the .0 version, you wait for some updates or the next version with bug fixes. I don't think FreeBSD should lower its standards so that any 14 year old can get into a system and do some damage. RTFM before you start putting your job on the line. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message