Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:33:11 +0000 From: Leorenz Jake Tabaong <ltabaong@ashfordfinance.com> To: "freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org> Subject: 100% FINANCING for your Cost of Goods Message-ID: <218FEBB7B1C1C94EA91F4EA8D2C8DC3A5CB0CE64@ASHFORDSRV.ashfordfinance.local>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Good Day! Do you have orders from your buyers that you are having difficulty to fulf= ill because your traditional funding sources are not sufficient to fund yo= ur growth or due to seasonal cash flow problems? Purchase Order Financing can help. Ashford Finance will finance 100% of yo= ur cost of goods charged by your suppliers to fulfill your orders from you= r end buyers thus sustaining your growth without any capital constraints. Ashford Finance, based in New York since 1986, specializes in Trade Financ= e and Purchase Order Financing whereby we will pay your supplier 100% of y= our cost of goods based on the credit worthiness of your end buyers rather= than your balance sheet, equity, or outstanding invoices. Ashford Finance= will advance against your purchase orders before a receivable is created.= We will also finance the resulting receivables providing one stop seamless= funding for your growth. This means that no money is coming out of your p= ocket to pay your supplier, carry your receivable and you will be able=20t= o grow your company without capital or funding restrictions. We finance US= and Canadian companies. If you would give us the opportunity, we would present to you all the deta= ils and try to personalize a funding solution for your firm for your perus= al. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Please visit our website www.ashfordfinance.com<http://www.ashfordfinance.= com/> for more information about the services that we offer. Kind Regards, Leorenz Jake Tabaong Business Development Officer Ashford Finance LLC 40 Wall Street 28th flr New York, NY,10005 Main line: 646-513-3333 x 103 Direct line: 917-525-4793 www.ashfordfinance.com ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Ashford Finance Email Security System. ______________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 23:56:24 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EFDF252; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3722223D05D; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:19:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5463C0E7.5020900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:19:51 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: How to handle port merges on upgrade for pkg/portmaster/portupgrade/port... (was: Dealing with a port being merged into another) References: <83y4s7hzqb.fsf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <83y4s7hzqb.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-doc>, <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>, <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:56:24 -0000 Am 23.10.2014 um 12:01 schrieb Raphael Kubo da Costa: > Hi everyone, > > One of the changes we (kde@) have made in the upcoming Qt 5.3.2 update > is merging devel/qt5-qmldevtools into lang/qt5-qml. > > I'd now like to know what needs to be done to make it easy to everyone > to upgrade their ports. By everyone I mean people using pkg as well as > people using port{master,upgrade,whatnot}, and by "make it easy" I mean > I don't want to have to write an UPDATING entry (that many people will > not read) that tells people they need to manually remove qt5-qmldevtools > from their systems before upgrading. > > Do I need CONFLICTS_INSTALL? Will everything be handled automatically? > Is the UPDATING entry inevitable? Greetings of the time of day, So, here goes my belated reply... portmaster will be happy with a MOVED entry and know about the substitute port, in this situation it got tripped up by <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194870>, i. e. /usr/local being preferred for linking over the local newly-built libs, leading to failure during the link stage if the older version is installed on the same system. I've had too much trouble with portupgrade to bother with it for the past five years or so. We should be aware that poudriere or Tinderbox will *not* find such upgrading problems for ports-based systems. So I propose that we amend to the porter's handbook with a recommendation to always test building an updated port revision on a live system with the older (previous) port version installed. Not just poudriere/Tinderbox. Hope that helps. Best regards, Matthias
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?218FEBB7B1C1C94EA91F4EA8D2C8DC3A5CB0CE64>