From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jul  2  9:20:17 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8E737B400
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  2 Jul 2002 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81D143E09
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  2 Jul 2002 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8])
          by sccrmhc03.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20020702162013.NZIW903.sccrmhc03.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>;
          Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:20:13 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA97200;
	Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: KSE status report 
In-Reply-To: <200207021106.aa15257@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020912391.95531-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Good idea.

Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and it
had the same problem (or so they said).

On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:

> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020054590.94626-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
> >The big problem at the moment is that something in the 
> >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE
> >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r.
> >(a bit ironic really).
> 
> Is the new
> 
> 	(elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1;
> 
> in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old
> bugs in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros.
> 
> Ian
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message