From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  9 11:36:50 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6104F16A425
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Dec 2005 11:36:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ai@bmc.brk.ru)
Received: from stalker.bmc.brk.ru (stalker.bmc.brk.ru [217.150.59.166])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968E643D67
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Dec 2005 11:36:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ai@bmc.brk.ru)
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:36:34 +0300
From: Artemiev Igor <ai@bmc.brk.ru>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <20051209143634.09bc2d90.ai@bmc.brk.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200512080951.52387.jhb@freebsd.org>
References: <20051206093020.691e1483.ai@bmc.brk.ru>
	<200512070816.46165.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<20051208090835.471a5584.ai@bmc.brk.ru>
	<200512080951.52387.jhb@freebsd.org>
Organization: Bryansk Medical Center
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta4 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nForce2 SMBus support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 11:36:50 -0000

On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:51:51 -0500
John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > I simply do not see any way to do it with current implementation of
> > ampdm(and also viapm, etc) & smbus, without modifying the smb-
> > >smbus->smbus driver interface. I may be wrong, but as far as I
> > >know, currently it's one
> > smb for one driver (smbus_* limitation)
> 
> Hmm, it doesn't specify the child device, just the parent.  *sigh*
> That's lame.  You don't have to call it amdpmsub0 btw, you could just
> call it amdpm1 if you wanted and have amdpm1 a child of amdpm0.  All
> that would need to change for that is the NF2_SUBDEV string and the
> DRIVER_MODULE line (it would be DRIVER_MODULE(amdpm, amdpm, ...)).
> This has the added advantage that you don't have to patch smbus.c.
I remade it as you described - can't understand, why I didn't think
about it myself

-- 
iprefetch ai