From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 14 23:33:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A971E16A4CE; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:33:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16E443D2F; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:33:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 0974D530E; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:33:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 645C0530A; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:32:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id E5D8233CA7; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:32:52 +0100 (CET) To: Wes Peters References: <200403091201.23665.wes@softweyr.com> <20040314211654.05d0bb9f.wes@softweyr.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:32:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040314211654.05d0bb9f.wes@softweyr.com> (Wes Peters's message of "Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:16:54 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: br260@cam.ac.uk cc: rwatson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a serious error in sched_ule.c? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:33:02 -0000 Wes Peters writes: > Sigh. Nobody really does compute-bound tasks anymore, do they? I really > miss "scientific programming." Actually, my wife is a molecular biologist and eats CPU hours with milk and sugar for breakfast. She expressed her satisfaction yesterday at finding out that her latest program only takes four and a half hours per data set. "But honey," says I, "you have 30,000 data sets!" Quoth the love of my life, "That's OK, we've got *two* computers." DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no