From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 6 13:53:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from www.smluc.org (smluc.org [206.138.44.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A447D37B8B6 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25151 invoked by uid 1000); 6 May 2002 20:47:00 -0000 From: erik@www.smluc.org Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 15:47:00 -0500 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/37790: mcrypt patch problem Message-ID: <20020506204700.GA25022@lazarus.smluc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi bug report is that security/mcrypt has a patch files that fails, the only patch file there is unnecessary and should be deleted. While looking, I found two other issues that might need to be addressed... 1) this port has some nasty unnecessary configuration stuff that forces extra dependancies and work, I think those should be removed. I'm willing to do that, but don't want to step on toes if the maintainer is active... 2) reponsibility in the pr (dated mar06) and bugmaster is "freebsd-ports", but the port has a listed maintainer. Is this a bug in gnats? Or is the makefile outdated and not reflecting something gnats knows? -- -Erik [http://math.smsu.edu/~erik] The opinions expressed by me are not necessarily opinions. In all probability, they are random rambling, and to be ignored. Failure to ignore may result in severe boredom or confusion. Shake well before opening. Keep Refrigerated. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message