Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 12:18:42 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems after PAO -> 2.2.5 stable Message-ID: <199711021918.MAA03389@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199711021912.UAA05459@gvr.gvr.org> References: <199711021707.KAA02909@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199711021912.UAA05459@gvr.gvr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Nate Williams wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, it looks like it only supports IRQ 3 as well. > > > > > > > > > > It also does 4. > > > > Not at sio1 according to the dumpcis output. > > Are your sure? Se 0c21 and 0x23 0x21 is at 0x3f8/sio0, and 0x23 is at 0x3e8/sio3, not at sio1. In the future the IRQ allocation won't be as important since we can really choose any IRQ we want as long as the card thinks it's using one of it's 'acceptable' IRQ's, but we're not yet there. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711021918.MAA03389>