From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 16:43:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0268D106564A for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 16:43:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 140888FC14 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 16:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Jun 2011 16:43:20 -0000 Received: from p4FE31997.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.3]) [79.227.25.151] by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 05 Jun 2011 18:43:20 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18GEzAJJ34G01G0LS4XuVez5uMWmxea3TUiNcJ8fK zD1aJkpOczJtbK Message-ID: <4DEBB220.2060906@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:43:12 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." , ports@freebsd.org References: <20110603001251.GA66356@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20110603065653.GB65291@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4DE8D764.20607@gmx.de> <4DEA8A0E.5070108@aldan.algebra.com> <4DEAB13F.5060809@FreeBSD.org> <4DEAEBAD.2040107@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4DEAEBAD.2040107@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or "expired"?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 16:43:24 -0000 Am 05.06.2011 04:36, schrieb Mikhail T.: > On 04.06.2011 18:27, Doug Barton wrote: >> The math on this is simple, there are maintainers willing to do the >> work, or not. > It does not matter, whether there are any such maintainers, /if there is > no work to do/. Neither lang/gpc nor databases/db2 (for one more > example) required a maintainer at all, when they got "pre-emptively" > killed... Let it rest. You could have offered to maintain it, but you didn't.