From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 10 11:44:17 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CC5C6A;
 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:44:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de)
Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [91.121.60.26])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3288417E0;
 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:44:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mail.kaan-bock.invalid [10.10.10.1])
 by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3bqz803B3JzLFP;
 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:44:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at enfer-du-nord.net
Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net ([10.10.10.1])
 by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [10.10.10.1]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
 with LMTP id oYkVwAnS9f0t; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:44:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (www.kaan-bock.invalid [10.10.10.2])
 by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3bqz7x02qhzLFD;
 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:44:12 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:44:12 +0200
From: Michael Grimm <trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?ipv=36=5Faddrs=5FIF=20aliases=20in=20rc=2Econf=28?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?=35=29?=
In-Reply-To: <4476561A-43B6-4A7F-B0E9-EB40F7C1177C@odo.in-berlin.de>
References: <50D1C553.9060100@wasikowski.net>
 <CA+7WWSewg+Qqcn1L508tAiBY1zLQfne6AC6w7oAco3y=efcX9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+7WWSeibFGNSwtjUeK-U6irj6axGftAHJC2eYU3tQoeM0JRpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121220132750.GB99616@stack.nl>
 <CA+7WWSdqjkZq1y0dyxV9LiycNA0V+CyEKt9x0d+WJaaWC4SXSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+7WWSc-VwdmYBEtZwO03x-p2o7-eUr9bWrhMhjBCUSah_0v_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <50D4F2E4.7020600@wasikowski.net>
 <CA+7WWSc9sR74RT=oMT8uSBmNYrK-80t7Y8KKZx9JxuVE4drXBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+7WWSdM=45i5knYHUa_Nq=2dta4ek8Q+p3g_Bf697d7_i__QA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+7WWSc9ORJQnvaVA0QVnwf4i=wEJ-+cYiOqQK3wDUDzL=TGTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121222171400.GA2399@anubis.morrow.me.uk>
 <50D5F296.9050109@wasikowski.net>
 <CA+7WWSdUFc1Xp-KikDjk2yRHP7S41Uxy3SdOrKZyP+cR7mp0KA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+7WWSfx2UO=yC25aaSWeGVPr2qtr-dkumH8Jxa7BiY7Xqarng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK=u2EV8gSW-mDv4o1VHUPL=+Q=RL7jAEuAjC+5+nKSqu+GhzQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+7WWSe26yVGvikjs98A136U02L=ECvnuLE+ZAj6M6=ufFacxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+7WWScqf3GomqgHOdMPri_omsKigSAOo4_=1qRHbOmHD z_x3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <4476561A-43B6-4A7F-B0E9-EB40F7C1177C@odo.in-berlin.de>
Message-ID: <a510f166326a26d5396b1afb0b5e36b6@mx1.enfer-du-nord.net>
X-Sender: trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:44:17 -0000

Hi --

[Upcoming code freeze in stable]

On 2013-04-13 22:15, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 13.04.2013, at 14:29, Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com> wrote:

> [great deal of simplification by ipv6_addrs_IF]
> 
>> Sorry to resurrect this thread but since nothing has happened in about
>> three months I have to ask: What can I do to have this commited to
>> HEAD?
> 
> +1
> 
> Nowadays -where IPv6 becomes more and more available by ISPs- I 
> *really*
> would like to see this simplification implemented, soon, very soon. The
> current scheme is way to much error prone, and, its a pain in the ass!
> 
> Thanks for the patch,
> Michael

Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't 
in stable yet.

Regards,
Michael