Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:17:14 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: secteam@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Why do we not mark vulnerable ports DEPRECATED? Message-ID: <4E5C9C8A.1010105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110830062541.GA5538@lonesome.com> References: <4E5C79AF.6000408@FreeBSD.org> <20110830062541.GA5538@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/29/2011 23:25, Mark Linimon wrote: > So, the right answer may be "it depends". I think my point is, it shouldn't. If a port is important/popular than it will be quickly fixed. If not, it goes away. Everyone wins. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5C9C8A.1010105>