From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 23 15:40:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CADC16A4D0 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B886D43D39 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:40:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1NNeC9q084100; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:40:12 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i1NNeCQn084095; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:40:12 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:40:12 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Colin Percival , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040223234012.GA83953@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Colin Percival , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <6.0.1.1.1.20040223171828.03de8b30@imap.sfu.ca> <20040223231219.GA83154@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040223231219.GA83154@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.6; AVE 6.24.0.4; VDF 6.24.0.15 Subject: Re: What to do about nologin(8)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:40:14 -0000 On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:12:19AM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > What that mystical reasons are, exactly? I see no one while it is not have Well, I know now that those reasons are LD_* passing. But it is not nologin problem at all. Lets not touch nologin, but fix callers instead (to never pass LD_*). Exact the same can happens with _any_ shell from ports or admin-made programs. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/