From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Sep  6  4:49:37 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D136914E39
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon,  6 Sep 1999 04:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 75798 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Sep 1999 11:47:33 +0000 (GMT)
To: sheldonh@uunet.co.za
Cc: madrapour@hotmail.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD 
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Sep 1999 13:38:28 +0200"
References: <28018.936617908@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 13:47:33 +0200
Message-ID: <75796.936618453@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> This is the third time I've seen someone try to use netstat to figure
> out who's listening to what. Do you think an xref to sockstat would be
> completely inappropriate in the netstat(1) manpage?

For those versions of FreeBSD where sockstat is installed by default
(at least 3.2-STABLE and newer), I think a reference to sockstat would
be an excellent idea.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message