Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:28:56 +0100 (CET) From: Nick Hibma <hibma@skylink.it> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/14968: Convert resource_head and resource.r_link from CIRCLEQ to TAILQ Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991119141938.3257C-100000@henny.jrc.it> In-Reply-To: <199911190518.AAA43167@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It's impossible for me to be wrong when the question under > consideration is one of my intent in writing something in a particular > way. There is a world full of people out there who don't share your sentiment for TV English. > Since the author of the PR provided no explanation of why he felt the > need to change data structures, I don't feel any obligation to do the > converse. Perhaps he is right, and another data structure would be > more appropriate, but it is up to him to explain what brings him to > that conclusion -- ``Here, have some patches!'' doesn't cut it. Bullocks and you know it. He sends in a patch which is more than most people do, and therefore has put some effort into doing things. If you want the argument behind the patch, then ask for it. Maybe he felt that it was too obvious to mention. By the way, 'Why?' is less work to type then 'Sez who!?', with respect to the number of characters as well as the space covered on the keyboard. Nick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.991119141938.3257C-100000>