From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 14:15:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BB4106564A; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from vps.hungerhost.com (vps.hungerhost.com [216.38.53.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7782E8FC0C; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hudson-trading.com ([209.249.190.9] helo=gnnmac.hudson-trading.com) by vps.hungerhost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ5HF-0007wm-5D; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:15:53 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: George Neville-Neil In-Reply-To: <4CE51CDA.6010202@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:15:52 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2A8C55CE-AD3A-419E-9028-EF8407596329@neville-neil.com> References: <4CE29718.2050508@freebsd.org> <4CE51CDA.6010202@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vps.hungerhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - neville-neil.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aperf/mperf X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:15:54 -0000 On Nov 18, 2010, at 07:32 , Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 18/11/2010 05:53 George Neville-Neil said the following: >>=20 >> On Nov 16, 2010, at 09:37 , Andriy Gapon wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> Many modern processors provide APERF and MPERF MSRs which allow to = easily and >>> reliable calculate average CPU performance level over some interval = of time. >>> This also allows to notice things like performance boost, which is = generally >>> hidden from software. >>> What would be a proper place to add code that would measure = APERF/MPERF ratio? >>> When should trigger such a measurement and over what interval? >>> Ideas? >>=20 >> Can you point me at documentation for this? This sounds a lot like >> hwpmc(4) and I wonder if we can make these available in the same way. >=20 > Actually it feels more cpufreq-ish to me. > This feature is documented in, e.g., Intel Software Developer's Manual = volume 3A, > section 14.2 P-STATE HARDWARE COORDINATION. Ah, yes, quite right on cpufreq etc. Thanks for the documentation = pointer though. Best, George