From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 24 14:38:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993A637B40B for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FreeBSD.org ([63.193.112.125]) by mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GY8008XFC3BEQ@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> for net@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:38:37 -0700 From: Jeffrey Hsu Subject: Re: apache and option USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT In-reply-to: Message from Julian Elischer "of Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:20:05 PDT." To: Julian Elischer Cc: net@freebsd.org Message-id: <0GY8008XGC3BEQ@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > does anyone know if FreeBSD is safe for having multiple processes do > accept() on the same listenning socket? I wrote a program on FreeBSD several years ago that does exactly this with multiple rforked child processes. In fact, someone recompiled my program on FreeBSD 4.5 last month to move it to a new server and the whole thing still works. Jeffrey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message