From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  8 09:36:34 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24461106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Jul 2008 09:36:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net)
Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net
	[66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6A38FC21
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Jul 2008 09:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3876F1CD18
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Jul 2008 01:36:32 -0800 (AKDT)
From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:36:31 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <OF942784A5.710EDC3E-ONC2257480.00327A6F-C2257480.0032AA12@procreditbank.bg>
In-Reply-To: <OF942784A5.710EDC3E-ONC2257480.00327A6F-C2257480.0032AA12@procreditbank.bg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200807081136.31140.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
Subject: Re: Jails and IP Aliasing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:36:34 -0000

On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:13:04 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast
> adrresses for the jails.
> It should be:
>
> inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
> inet 10.0.1.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
> inet 10.0.1.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255

You guess wrong. Aliases SHOULD (as in IETF RFC should) have 255.255.255.255 
netmask.

-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
    and never get to the software part.