Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:19:24 +0000 From: tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: tmp and tmpfs Message-ID: <X7KYfEsH0WU6hBxc@rpi4.local>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+nudpQhP7106U2Bo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Him context is rpi4 running very recent -current. Which is faster/better? /tmp mounted as tmpfs as per default on rpi2/3/4, o= r /tmp as zfs on a usb3-connected spinning rust hd? I understand that if tm= pfs fills up, it'll use swap. Faster/slower than /tmp on zfs? Spinning rust is also where the swap partition lives. thanks --=20 J. --+nudpQhP7106U2Bo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl+ymHMACgkQs8o7QhFz NAU2SA/7BCKEbhOl+btFfWn/FHrAplP0jj310PDv2alVmxpKIVuULK3XCVmnRpP2 bq/k96g/UbWFR2ebcUFNp86DAeA13Ho3N6QJCKrNVUeqGvf3LVgFxP/mcAZZolXD k5gpYh7nQ5+yp5EJj9i3UcBRsgLXVVGt/Apnr6hvGoQJ3kITalESZv3pJWX0Lk7p ksLrR9Zh5uwY/k7AUdGa7OfWBsvpjvlDKXTtJEAJL6nuYWEfja7DS2uG92Ei59OS ImX0j+m5sA1wXBRdezl0LeJejvPMPNHvMOaAvKL4m0l0iF5kMVl1Vy2Bao3CbFyc a2M6yqseLv0jFPq0SlNUG6odoJG5q/nTWnnhfNZyrkX+QjJPnhbWKNSLeEYL608I Zs+m5EV2q1W5aNXuX+KYvfRcX7vsIwzUuTK/dfzkr7WNM3tAzi8/OVAsMXXdS5w9 oRsjYErKolJhWS6Eptx3HtcxlKYkwo4N8ET0/b13lOXXI9eZ5UNb13XUDfxogrom rYVbCXvInybkPtT8f+o52Pw+vkavo3x3qgiNxrEntX8ZYJT6Z7bFncHglxc1ptnG Ew3PM5wCiNuHFrubYzgO/g/tK7EVByyf3Lk3zs8uU3pMXr5eT6/pB2u/g5StoLTv FgQaEwf19r0HAltLQguyx+VKi0zVM7rtKoWvM2xMRvnO6UOfGbM= =y6tU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+nudpQhP7106U2Bo--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?X7KYfEsH0WU6hBxc>