Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:18:07 -0800
From:      Kent Stewart <kstewart@3-cities.com>
To:        Arcady Genkin <a.genkin@utoronto.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: One drive much slower than another
Message-ID:  <385FE07F.5205DAF7@3-cities.com>
References:  <87vh5s59yk.fsf@main.wgaf.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Arcady Genkin wrote:
> 
> I run 3.4-R on a P166 box with 2 HDs:
> 
> WD Caviar 22100 2.1G
>   Rpm: 5400
>   Average Seek Time: sub 12 ms
> 
> Quantum Bigfoot 19G
>   Rpm: 4000
>   Average Seek Time: 10.5 ms
> 
> I use the WD as a system drive, and the Quantum for data. Now it turns
> out that the 4000rpm Quantum works *much* faster than 5400rpm WD... I
> have softupdates enabled on both drives' partitions where I ran my
> tests.
> ,----- Here's relevant info from "dmesg":
> | wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 flags 0xb0ffb0ff on isa
> | wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): <WDC AC22100H>, LBA, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16
> | wd0: 2014MB (4124736 sectors), 1023 cyls, 64 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> | wdc1 at 0x170-0x177 irq 15 flags 0xb0ffb0ff on isa
> | wdc1: unit 0 (wd2): <QUANTUM BIGFOOT TS19.2A>, LBA, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16
> | wd2: 18366MB (37615536 sectors), 2341 cyls, 255 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> `-----
> ,----- Output from "mount":
> | door:~$ /sbin/mount
> | /dev/wd0s1a on / (ufs, local, writes: sync 15 async 48)
> | /dev/wd0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 2 async 31)
> | /dev/wd0s1e on /var (ufs, local, writes: sync 106 async 252)
> | /dev/wd2s1e on /mnt/data1 (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 2 async 0)
> | /dev/wd2s1f on /mnt/data2 (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 2 async 0)
> | /dev/wd2s1g on /mnt/data3 (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 2 async 0)
> | procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
> `-----
> As you can see, the two drives are on two separate controllers, and
> both controllers have exactly same flags.
> When I ran tests, outlined by Dale Hagglund, I found out that the
> Quantum writes at 10MB/s, whereas the WD -- only at 3MB/s. I did my
> tests in partitions, where softupdates are enabled:
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=100m bs=1m count=100
> 
> ,----- Test on Quantum:
> | door:/mnt/data3$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=100m bs=1m count=100
> | 100+0 records in
> | 100+0 records out
> | 104857600 bytes transferred in 10.362510 secs (10118938 bytes/sec)
> |
> | real    0m10.529s
> | user    0m0.016s
> | sys     0m6.320s
> `-----
> ,----- Test on WD:
> | door:/usr/tmp$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=100m bs=1m count=100
> | 100+0 records in
> | 100+0 records out
> | 104857600 bytes transferred in 28.097030 secs (3731982 bytes/sec)
> |
> | real    0m29.046s
> | user    0m0.001s
> | sys     0m5.391s
> `-----
> 
> Has anyone got any ideas how I can improve performance of the WD?
> Thanks for any input!

Make sure you have the advanced features turned on for the WD drive.
You may have a slow setting in your bios.

Kent

> --
> Arcady Genkin                                http://wgaf.dyndns.org
> "'What good is my pity? Is not the pity the cross upon which he who
> loves man is nailed?..'" (Zarathustra - F. Nietzsche)
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kstewart@3-cities.com
http://www.3-cities.com/~kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/

SETI(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) @ HOME
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?385FE07F.5205DAF7>