From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 07:46:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0010F16A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:46:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EC443D49 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:46:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k137kR2v031650; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:46:27 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:46:27 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060202203829.GA800@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20060203103612.A94340@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060202144233.K1223@woozle.rinet.ru> <8C4626B1-84AE-4A50-8AA0-5EF63364EF75@brooknet.com.au> <20060202201823.GA29026@soaustin.net> <20060202203829.GA800@xor.obsecurity.org> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:46:27 +0300 (MSK) Cc: Mark Linimon , Sam Lawrance , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: print/cups strange dependency glitch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 07:46:36 -0000 On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:18:23PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: KK> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:46:02PM +1100, Sam Lawrance wrote: KK> > > It's a known issue. There is a PR about it (ports/86310). KK> > KK> > 86310 has already been committed. Let me know if this problem still KK> > exists with the latest bsd.*.mk. KK> KK> You're testing the followup patch thought, right? Hmm, could you please point me to that followup? 86310 contains only one patch, and it has been committed; still failing. Did not find any relevant in gnats after 86310; however, I can simply ovelook. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------