Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:31:18 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: man pages Message-ID: <XFMail.010316143118.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103161420150.773-100000@zeppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16-Mar-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > Actually, I think you only need disable_intr && restore_intr, which should be > paired over tight MD code sections, and yes, leaving it ambigious is > desirable > IMO. Actually, the cy(4) driver uses explicit enable_intr()'s as does some of the 386 fpu code, and the pre-spinlock variant of the sio(4) driver also used explicit enable_intr(). I'm not a big fan out of it myself, but some things do need it. The manpages look good though I'd be inclined personally to collapse them into a single intr.9 manpage. Also, the actual functions are declared in <machine/cpufunc.h>, and I didn't write these, I am just tweaking them. :) -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010316143118.jhb>