From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Oct 1 11:45:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA00299 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 11:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tok.qiv.com (uucp@[204.214.141.211]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA00286 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 11:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tok.qiv.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with UUCP id NAA26942; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 13:45:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost) by acp.qiv.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA00849; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 13:44:06 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: acp.qiv.com: jdn owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 13:44:05 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jay D. Nelson" To: MetcalJM@utrc.utc.com cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FW: Are 3COM 3C90x Ethernet adapters supported? In-Reply-To: <95A2D2968BD9D011A38B00A0C95727DB27AB0A@express2.res.utc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Yep -- 2.2-970819-RELENG and a 3c900 XL. It works as well as the adapter is capable. I would use another adapter if you have the choice. -- Jay On Wed, 1 Oct 1997 MetcalJM@utrc.utc.com wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeffrey M. Metcalf [SMTP:metcaljm@NOSPAM.utrc.utc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 1997 1:31 PM > > Subject: Q: Are 3COM 3C90x Ethernet adapters supported? > > > > Hello, > > > > I am writing to ask if anyone has successfully set up FreeBSD with > > any of the 3COM 3C90x Ethernet adapters, or has reason to believe that > > > > they might work under FreeBSD. The following are the 3COM cards for > > which the FreeBSD Handbook makes explicit mention of compatibility: > > > > > > 3Com 3C501 cards > > 3Com 3C503 Etherlink II > > 3Com 3c505 Etherlink/+ > > 3Com 3C507 Etherlink 16/TP > > 3Com 3C509, 3C579, 3C589 (PCMCIA) Etherlink III > > 3Com 3C590, 3C595 Etherlink III > > > > > > I understand that sometimes hardware which is not explicitly listed in > > > > the hardware compatibility guide still adheres to the protocols of > > other > > devices which are supported. The machine I am considering for an > > install > > is my workstation, and I don't want to bother if the ethernet card is > > not supported. > > > > Does anyone have any feelings on this issue? > > > > Thanks, > > > > JM > > > > -- > > Jeffrey M. Metcalf > > Assistant Computer Systems Support Engineer > > United Technologies Research Center > > metcaljm@NOSPAM.utrc.utc.com (Remove the NOSPAM. for e-mail > > replies) > -- Jay