From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 22 15:06:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D9C03FE for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4665A837 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3866EB9C7; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:06:51 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1-amd64 -> booting on a HP DL380 Gen9 results in panic Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:57:16 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201412220957.16974.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:06:51 -0500 (EST) Cc: Rainer Duffner X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:06:52 -0000 On Thursday, December 18, 2014 7:27:13 pm Rainer Duffner wrote: > Hi, >=20 > we got one to test and it booted using the UEFI memory stick image. >=20 > However, I get a panic after > Event time =E2=80=9ELAPIC=E2=80=9C quality 600 > ACPI APIC Table: > panic: APIC: CPU with APIC ID 0 is not enabled > cpuid =3D 0 >=20 > and then a stack backtrace >=20 >=20 > What does that mean? >=20 > AFAIK, I have a single E5-2620V3 CPU and 16 GB RAM in there. >=20 >=20 > It=E2=80=99s primarily intended as a test-system - but earlier or later I= will have=20 to put one into production because we=E2=80=99ll likely stop procuring Gen8= systems=20 sometime next year (when they simply stop becoming available). >=20 > I haven=E2=80=99t tried a snapshot of current. Eh, the table that ACPI provides that lists the available CPUs in the syste= m=20 claims that that the CPU that the kernel booted from is disabled. We assum= e=20 that the boot processor is valid and enabled (since it is running the kerne= l=20 already!) This is almost certainly a firmware bug. Booting without UEFI=20 would be a good test as Mark suggested. If you can capture a verbose dmesg= ,=20 that would also include enough details about what we found in the ACPI tabl= e=20 to debug this further perhaps. =2D-=20 John Baldwin