From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 22:52:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CE3106568B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:52:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smtp-out3.tiscali.nl (smtp-out3.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D348FC25 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from [212.123.145.58] (helo=guido.klop.ws) by smtp-out3.tiscali.nl with smtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl) id 1JZD61-0005NA-Up for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:37:22 +0100 Received: (qmail 4434 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2008 22:37:18 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO guido.klop.ws) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 22:37:18 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:37:17 +0100 To: ken , mbowie@buzmo.com From: "Ronald Klop" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080309.212020.1678758621.ken@tydfam.jp> <20080311.122809.-345485952.ken@tydfam.jp> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20080311.122809.-345485952.ken@tydfam.jp> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.26 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, glewis@eyebeyond.com, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eclipse-devel 3.3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:52:37 -0000 On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:28:09 +0100, ken wrote: > My appology, Mike. > I found that I made a mistake and brought in a lot of bugs relating to > minor versioning of plugins with eclipse-devel332.tgz. > > Please pick up newer one from > http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-devel332.tgz and give a try. I checked it > with amd64/jdk15 and it is seemingly OK. Is it possible to install this next to the current eclipse-devel? That would be easy for testing and still having the possibility to switch back fast if something doesn't work. Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands