Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:00:19 +1100
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>,Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com>,manu@freebsd.org
Cc: questions@freebsd.org,re@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Boot fail: 12.4-R-{dvd1,disc1}.iso via USB
Message-ID: <5A81E443-53D5-4298-996C-8128C5406A18@nimnet.asn.au>
In-Reply-To: <0100018606040792-ab1ac76b-2bfa-468d-a9a4-7c56022d0a1e-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <C1EFBA49-3C97-487A-878E-9C02C2B3D944@nimnet.asn.au> <CAGMYy3uHKhKQ8jVcVWMqKaMvmDZB=%2BYf_7D0Bndzg_j6sCx_Ww@mail.gmail.com> <72EA6A69-D948-41A3-8D81-EBF24BAE835B@nimnet.asn.au> <0100018606040792-ab1ac76b-2bfa-468d-a9a4-7c56022d0a1e-000000@email.amazonses.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 January 2023 3:09:32 pm AEDT, Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap=2Ecom>= wrote: > On 1/30/23 18:52, Ian Smith wrote: > > Any chance of re@ applying the patch to > release/amd64/mkisoimages=2Esh and making the revised dvd1=2Eiso > available? > No=2E We don't re-roll ISOs, for many reasons but mainly because it > would > result in hashes not matching the release announcement=2E Oh sure, I didn't mean replacement, but I'm sure re@'s had quite enough of= 12=2E > We have on *very* rare occasions (4=2E6=2E2, 5=2E2=2E1, 11=2E0p1) done = a "patch > level release"=2E I can't imagine that happening in this case=2E >=20 > With hat: re@ Thanks Colin, and crew=2E I'm not dead in the water; despite needing to r= einstall I took 12=2E3 to 12=2E4 with freebsd-update, so I know that works= =2E cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A81E443-53D5-4298-996C-8128C5406A18>