From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 18 19:05:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB22216A4CE; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dcn.infos.ru (dcn.infos.ru [195.209.228.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842C643D1F; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petert@dcn.infos.ru) Received: from dcn (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dcn (Postfix) with SMTP id B81EE2E9E3; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:05:56 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp.xj.dcn (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 87AF82E9E9; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:05:56 +0300 (MSK) Received: from tank-ls.xj.dcn (unknown [10.0.103.154]) by smtp.xj.dcn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824462E9DE; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:05:50 +0300 (MSK) From: Peter Trifonov To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:09:59 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200501181339.38078.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200501181339.38078.jhb@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200501182209.59517.petert@dcn.infos.ru> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on dcn.xj.dcn X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 cc: Peter Trifonov cc: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Lost interrupts on SMP systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:05:59 -0000 Hello John, On Tuesday 18 January 2005 21:39, John Baldwin wrote: > > Thanks a lot!!! > > Now the box works perfectly! > > Excellent. Can you try this additional change and see if it still works or > if it breaks things? In past experience, ISA interrupts haven't ever been > programmed as level/hi, but always either edge/hi or level/lo, so I want to > try using lo polarity based on the ELCR as well. (I'm trying to avoid > possibly breaking other boxes in the field.) Now it does not work. It complains about interrupt storm on IRQ 10 (xl0), IRQ 11 ( xl1,xl2) and IRQ 9 (ahc0). After this many errors were reported by the SCSI controller and the box was rebooted with old kernel. -- With best regards, P. Trifonov