Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Feb 2020 02:33:02 -0700
From:      Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
To:        araujo@freebsd.org
Cc:        Dima Panov <fluffy@freebsd.org>, Rebecca Cran <bcran@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r525460 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve-devel sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve/files
Message-ID:  <492bb276-06fa-6e4c-2a33-a026448851de@bsdio.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZg%2B-%2B_tsN1oaTrtDc4_C%2BaQcp51N%2Bn0C=Bg1VA3OaYs0g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <202002070444.0174iOaP083542@repo.freebsd.org> <98b1bcb9-f2f4-432b-abd3-4885b1cb9de6@Canary> <f497fdde-555b-cf06-e434-f978e39ddc23@bsdio.com> <CAOfEmZg%2B-%2B_tsN1oaTrtDc4_C%2BaQcp51N%2Bn0C=Bg1VA3OaYs0g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-02-08 01:23, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
>
> You should have tested it better, you even didn't bother to check if
> other ports depends of this one, and silly me thought you have done it.
>
> Revert it would be the best option IMHO.
>
> But in other hand as the damage is done already, mark as broken try to
> fix it as well as your procedures how you test software. It is not the
> first or second time you break these porta because you don't run
> enough tests.

I'll revert it. I'm not that interested in maintaining ports software,
so I'll continue working on Bhyve and submit changes via bugzilla instead.


-- 
Rebecca Cran





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?492bb276-06fa-6e4c-2a33-a026448851de>