From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 5 14:32:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5913106564A; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835738FC12; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB483D23D05; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9DE1D23C04; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:32:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F7DAD0F.9020504@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:32:47 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wesley Shields References: <201204050650.q356o8No010393@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120405125508.GA99623@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20120405125508.GA99623@atarininja.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/gist Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:32:53 -0000 On 4/5/12 8:55 AM, Wesley Shields wrote: >> because size of distfile changed radically > Did you take a look at the differences between the old and new distfile? > We need to always be vigilant of distfiles changing out from under us > and carefully review the changes before we commit the update. > which is why I added that to the maintainers log. It was radically different, as you can see by the diffs for distinfo. 'distfile changing'? That was why the maintainer posted the pr, specifically with distfile changing. I watch for (and won't take a pr for) a new-port that uses things like 'dropbox/' megaupload :-) or personal accounts (well, maybe people.freebsd.org). I have had people tell me they have to use a personal account because the tarball is not available, and they need to 'git' the source. I have had my ports pr's rejected by a maintainer/committer because the PATCH was in people.freebsd.org/~scheidell (and, pointing to the authoritative source as primary.. waiting for the primary source mirrors to catch up.) in this case, what should I have done? new distfile is 40x the size of the original ? yeh, its radically changed. no, the maintainer didn't say it was radically changed, I did. -SHA256 (gist) = 5089b3b300d16a83b54c7ddf5dfc3561cadda35dae4a002bc66d888526ef9033 -SIZE (gist) = 17761 +SHA256 (defunkt-gist-v3.1.0-0-g82ffb80.tar.gz) = d26149363ad7529fe408ce810401ef6bbfbb2c4dc4bff9adbc80862c04cbaa47 +SIZE (defunkt-gist-v3.1.0-0-g82ffb80.tar.gz) = 699830 -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell