From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 23 23:10:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425451546F for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 23:10:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id XAA00420; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 23:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 23:10:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903240710.XAA00420@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Subject: Re: ports/10724: editors/mule incorrect arch-dependent data dir Reply-To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/10724; it has been noted by GNATS. From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) To: hiro@eken.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/10724: editors/mule incorrect arch-dependent data dir Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 22:57:36 -0800 (PST) * Actually I prefer removing the definition of CONFIGURE_TARGET in * mule-common/Makefile. But mule-common port generated wrong TMPPLIST * when I removed the following line from mule-common/Makefile. Maybe I am You're right, it failed here too. I took a look, it seems PLIST_SUB is used too early in bsd.port.mk. I'll commit a fix to both, thanks. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message