From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov 11 21:20:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA07090
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 21:20:55 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from server.local.sunyit.edu (A-T34.rh.sunyit.edu [150.156.210.241])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07059
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 21:20:47 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from perlsta@cs.sunyit.edu)
Received: from localhost (perlsta@localhost)
	by server.local.sunyit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA14487
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 01:25:17 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: server.local.sunyit.edu: perlsta owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 01:25:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Alfred Perlstein <perlsta@cs.sunyit.edu>
X-Sender: perlsta@server.local.sunyit.edu
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: LFS system?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971112012347.14332A-100000@server.local.sunyit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


has any though been put towards a log based File system?
would it be a performance gain at all? i think it could be a major
improvement on heavily modified file systems for instance on a large News
server were a sync might take a few seconds to complete.

-Alfred