From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 28 18:10:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webjockey.net (mail.webjockey.net [208.141.46.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9796A37B400 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stormspe.outloud.org (ISSA.cm.gscyclone.com [24.206.5.44]) by mail.webjockey.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g3T19vhQ059531; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:10:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gary@outloud.org) Message-Id: <5.1.1.2.2.20020428210937.00b79fc8@208.141.46.254> X-Sender: ancient@208.141.46.254 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1.3 (Beta) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:10:11 -0400 To: Terry Lambert From: Gary Stanley Subject: Re: load balancing with 2 nic cards possible? Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3CCC9A61.A154D411@mindspring.com> References: <5.1.1.2.2.20020426234504.029f7c30@208.141.46.3> <3CCA4004.B9A8D57A@mindspring.com> <20020427161558.CC4CF2744@tesla.foo.is> <002301c1eef6$5894d940$4e76cb3f@ssn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 05:57 PM 4/28/2002 -0700, you wrote: >Matt wrote: > > You may try some other kind of load balance and fail safe from > > www.xgforce.com. It's a layer 3 and layer 7 global clustering software for > > FreeBSD. > >Wrong kind of "load balancing". The original poster wanted >channel bonding, not server load balancing. > >The layer 3 in the referenced product is (apparently) not >really layer 3. VIPs alone do not a layer 3 load balancer >make. > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message I'm always for new ideas, no matter if it strays off-topic. ;-) /ges To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message