From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 15 06:35:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545371065672; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [195.88.108.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C398FC19; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36AF41C750; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:35:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([195.88.108.3]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7uMYxPUMEJa; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 0DF4441C757; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3684448E6; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:34:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Edwin Groothuis In-Reply-To: <200906150217.n5F2HA9C076656@svn.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20090615062346.Q22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200906150217.n5F2HA9C076656@svn.freebsd.org> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r194231 - head/share/timedef X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:35:08 -0000 On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Author: edwin > Date: Mon Jun 15 02:17:10 2009 > New Revision: 194231 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/194231 > > Log: > Undo the change in r193688 as suggested in conf/72076. > > People on IRC and the -doc mailinglist (June 2009) showed that this > new format wasn't used or known widely enough to justify the change. grml; it is but people have been ignorant for ages now, still using DIN 1355; not sure we want to encourage this anymore:( What follows is from the top of my head: ISO8601 - from 198x[x=8|9]/1991 EN28601 - from 1992 DIN5008 - from 2001 In contrast to that DIN1355 imho was fomm 194x, changed at least 1975 and I think they did something mid-90s after EN28601 was out. Imho since 2005 or 2006 ISO8601 is authoritative. > Modified: > head/share/timedef/de_DE.ISO8859-1.src > head/share/timedef/de_DE.UTF-8.src > > Modified: head/share/timedef/de_DE.ISO8859-1.src > ============================================================================== > --- head/share/timedef/de_DE.ISO8859-1.src Mon Jun 15 01:09:19 2009 (r194230) > +++ head/share/timedef/de_DE.ISO8859-1.src Mon Jun 15 02:17:10 2009 (r194231) > @@ -59,7 +59,11 @@ Samstag > # > # x_fmt > # > -%Y-%m-%d > +# Note about the new DIN5008, ISO8601 and EN28601 format of %Y-%m-%d: > +# A quick poll on IRC and the -doc mailinglist (June 2009) showed that > +# this format was not used often enough to push this change through. > +# > +%d.%m.%Y > # > # c_fmt > # > > Modified: head/share/timedef/de_DE.UTF-8.src > ============================================================================== > --- head/share/timedef/de_DE.UTF-8.src Mon Jun 15 01:09:19 2009 (r194230) > +++ head/share/timedef/de_DE.UTF-8.src Mon Jun 15 02:17:10 2009 (r194231) > @@ -59,7 +59,11 @@ Samstag > # > # x_fmt > # > -%Y-%m-%d > +# Note about the new DIN5008, ISO8601 and EN28601 format of %Y-%m-%d: > +# A quick poll on IRC and the -doc mailinglist (June 2009) showed that > +# this format was not used often enough to push this change through. > +# > +%d.%m.%Y > # > # c_fmt > # > -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.