Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:03:38 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr-feedback@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion Message-ID: <4EF3007A.9000903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4ef3013b.cnyP9UsPsM47M6Qp%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201112210829.pBL8Tbv0054784@portsmonj.FreeBSD.org> <4ef3013b.cnyP9UsPsM47M6Qp%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22/12/2011 10:06, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > >> portname: misc/gtkfind >> description: The program to use to have to remember all the >> options to find(1) >> maintainer: ports@FreeBSD.org >> deprecated because: No more public distfiles, no more upstream >> expiration date: 2011-12-03 >> build errors: none. >> overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=misc&portname=gtkfind > > This was supposed to have been resuscitated. Is its continued > inclusion here fallout from the svn/cvs issue, or is there another > problem? Don't worry, it's still definitely undeprecated :) Mark, has the tree got out of date again? Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO8wB6AAoJELCEktHh68rEd6EH/je2T2kBAj2M7ZtMnfb1pA1g s0uhGWUk8YxE0UQuqxty9S0ZRQ/+tOzHS+7PDfvW/MMxVpv6c3nlin+BdlqTrMWV baIjvSr6KBKnSHb6j/LJflAfO9vZVNO5TUNk8dX14qdyon9o1Po7Orf/Hj1gt7by /HgQWuVomSYluQa1i/uIg2I+/iYiPAvV5cNTruJt1Fj5VfEdDPRXVeCUob85HCWJ T6HW67zZnxNlE4oAYrznwGuBle8IsVRbbwwVvnjxCv3/uB8yVIwtW44zdo+Mqc3B GRPwHfLmwhPZ8BaCNvuStYNlqwiiRoAOSgGT3fxtslAe9wV3vLr0gqqo4NQp10Y= =VKNz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF3007A.9000903>