Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:52:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>
To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD ARM List <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ampere2's main-armv7 crashed after only 3 min 51 sec, nothing started to build; libdm.so.{6->7} issues
Message-ID: <1902543396.49319.1729630346915@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <4FDD9A40-B415-42B5-BA89-B89565C2A168@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
------=_Part_49318_2106664272.1729630346910 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ampere2 is building armv7 again https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere2/build.html?mastername=main-armv7-default&build=p94c4ac6b071b_sc87b3f0006 BTW: I made a graph that shows how old a pkg repo is per architecture.It shows that arm/aarch64 is significantly older than i386/amd64. But also that armv7 is way behind the rest now. https://www.klop.ws/pkgstats/pkg-age.html Regards,Ronald Van: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Datum: 14 oktober 2024 01:41 Aan: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> CC: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD ARM List <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> Onderwerp: Re: ampere2's main-armv7 crashed after only 3 min 51 sec, nothing started to build; libdm.so.{6->7} issues > > > On Oct 13, 2024, at 13:18, Ronald Klop wrote: > > > On ampere3 armv7 builds crashed in the same way. > > > > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere3/ > > > > Regards, > > Ronald > > > >> Van: Mark Millard > >> Datum: 13 oktober 2024 22:13 > >> Aan: Antoine Brodin , FreeBSD Mailing List , FreeBSD ARM List > >> CC: Philip Paeps > >> Onderwerp: ampere2's main-armv7 crashed after only 3 min 51 sec, nothing started to build; libdm.so.{6->7} issues > >> > >> main-armv7 crashed before it was at a stage that has public log files to look > >> at. > >> > >> I report this mostly because the currently distributed main-packages for ports > >> that involve use of libmd.so.6 are broken because main now has/uses libmd.so.7 > >> instead --so libmd.so.6 tends to be missing. Even when libmd.so.6 and > >> libmd.so.7 both exist, the pkg (non -static) command is broken from the > >> recursive dependencies ending up referencing both. (pkg-static works but pkg > >> does not.) > >> > >> It might be that the crash is because of the libmd.so.6 to libmd.so.7 change > >> in main. But I've no access to logs to look at. > >> > >> It would be good to avoid having another main-arm64 bulk -a happen before > >> main-armv7 has a chance to produce main-armv7 packages with libmd.so.7 > >> references so that ports are again good for (modern) main-FreeBSD [so: 15]. > >> > >> But it seems that, for main-arm* port-packages, either: > >> > >> 0) various distributed ports are incompatible with libmd.so.7 based > >> main-FreeBSD (the current context for main-armv7) > >> > >> vs. > >> > >> 1) various distributed ports will be incompatible with libmd.so.6 > >> based main-FreeBSD (so: older main/15 FreeBSD installations): > >> the future contexts for main-armv7 and main-arm64 (and more). > >> > >> > >> FYI: The libmd.so.{6->7} change dates back to 2024-Sep-30 in FreeBSD's main. > >> But the __FreeBSD_version 150002{3->4} change did not happen until > >> 2024-Oct-02. > >> > >> > >> main-powerpc-default's status for such: > >> > >> Looks like FreeBSD:15:powerpc/latest/ was last updated on 2024-Mar-07 > >> and so might not have the issue --by no longer having port-package > >> updates of any kind. (32-bit powerpc is not to be supported by > >> releng/15.0 as I understand: The only 32-bit platform will be armv7 > >> as I understand.) > > Looks like I should have done a wider exploration instead > of presuming just main-armv7 was broken. > > An interesting point is that none of the *-armv7-quarterly > jails have failed so far. Just the *-armv7-default have > failed: > > main-armv7-default p149fe86b8e79_s149e1af6a , > 141releng-armv7-default 1f84c1fae602 , > 133releng-armv7-default 1f84c1fae602 . > > I'll note that the arm64 ones did not fail: > > main-arm64-default p149fe86b8e79_s149e1af6ae4 > 141arm64-default 1f84c1fae602 , > 133arm64-default 1f84c1fae602 . > > 133releng-armv7-default is the oldest failure for this issue: > Sun, 06 Oct 2024 23:33:31 GMT start with elapsed: 00:05:26 . > > 133releng-armv7-default had a prior build: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:55:19 GMT 58:03:54 > > 141releng-armv7-default had no prior build attempts ( was: 140releng-armv7-default ). > > main-armv7-default had a prior build: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 04:21:42 GMT 61:50:05 > > > I wonder what a common change is across the failing examples. > > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > > > > > ------=_Part_49318_2106664272.1729630346910 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head></head><body>Ampere2 is building armv7 again<br class=3D"rw_ext= ra"><br><a href=3D"https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere2/build.html?master= name=3Dmain-armv7-default&build=3Dp94c4ac6b071b_sc87b3f0006">https://pk= g-status.freebsd.org/ampere2/build.html?mastername=3Dmain-armv7-default&= ;build=3Dp94c4ac6b071b_sc87b3f0006</a><br class=3D"rw_extra"><br>BTW: I mad= e a graph that shows how old a pkg repo is per architecture.<br class=3D"rw= _extra">It shows that arm/aarch64 is significantly older than i386/amd64. &= nbsp;But also that armv7 is way behind the rest now.<br><div><a href=3D"htt= ps://www.klop.ws/pkgstats/pkg-age.html">https://www.klop.ws/pkgstats/pkg-ag= e.html</a><br><br>Regards,<br class=3D"rw_extra">Ronald<br class=3D"rw_extr= a"><br><p><small><strong>Van:</strong> Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com&g= t;<br><strong>Datum:</strong> 14 oktober 2024 01:41<br><strong>Aan:</strong= > Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws><br><strong>CC:</strong> Antoine = Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@= freebsd.org>, FreeBSD ARM List <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, Philip P= aeps <philip@freebsd.org><br><strong>Onderwerp:</strong> Re: ampere2'= s main-armv7 crashed after only 3 min 51 sec, nothing started to build; li= bdm.so.{6->7} issues<br></small></p><blockquote style=3D"margin-left: 5p= x; border-left: 3px solid #ccc; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px;"><div= class=3D"MessageRFC822Viewer" id=3D"P"><!-- P --> <!-- processMimeMessage --><div class=3D"TextPlainViewer" id=3D"P.P"><!-- P= .P -->On Oct 13, 2024, at 13:18, Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> wrote:<= br> <br> > On ampere3 armv7 builds crashed in the same way. <br> > <br> > <a href=3D"https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere3/">https://pkg-status= .freebsd.org/ampere3/</a><br> > <br> > Regards,<br> > Ronald<br> > <br> >> Van: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com><br> >> Datum: 13 oktober 2024 22:13<br> >> Aan: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <f= reebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD ARM List <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org><br> >> CC: Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org><br> >> Onderwerp: ampere2's main-armv7 crashed after only 3 min 51 sec, n= othing started to build; libdm.so.{6->7} issues<br> >> <br> >> main-armv7 crashed before it was at a stage that has public log fi= les to look<br> >> at.<br> >> <br> >> I report this mostly because the currently distributed main-packag= es for ports<br> >> that involve use of libmd.so.6 are broken because main now has/use= s libmd.so.7<br> >> instead --so libmd.so.6 tends to be missing. Even when libmd.so.6 = and<br> >> libmd.so.7 both exist, the pkg (non -static) command is broken fro= m the<br> >> recursive dependencies ending up referencing both. (pkg-static wor= ks but pkg<br> >> does not.)<br> >> <br> >> It might be that the crash is because of the libmd.so.6 to libmd.s= o.7 change<br> >> in main. But I've no access to logs to look at.<br> >> <br> >> It would be good to avoid having another main-arm64 bulk -a happen= before<br> >> main-armv7 has a chance to produce main-armv7 packages with libmd.= so.7<br> >> references so that ports are again good for (modern) main-FreeBSD = [so: 15].<br> >> <br> >> But it seems that, for main-arm* port-packages, either:<br> >> <br> >> 0) various distributed ports are incompatible with libmd.so.7 base= d<br> >> main-FreeBSD (the current context for main= -armv7)<br> >> <br> >> vs.<br> >> <br> >> 1) various distributed ports will be incompatible with libmd.so.6<= br> >> based main-FreeBSD (so: older main/1= 5 FreeBSD installations):<br> >> the future contexts for main-armv7 a= nd main-arm64 (and more).<br> >> <br> >> <br> >> FYI: The libmd.so.{6->7} change dates back to 2024-Sep-30 in Fr= eeBSD's main.<br> >> But the __FreeBSD_version 150002{3->4} change did not happen un= til<br> >> 2024-Oct-02.<br> >> <br> >> <br> >> main-powerpc-default's status for such:<br> >> <br> >> Looks like FreeBSD:15:powerpc/latest/ was last updated on 2024-Mar= -07<br> >> and so might not have the issue --by no longer having port-package= <br> >> updates of any kind. (32-bit powerpc is not to be supported by<br> >> releng/15.0 as I understand: The only 32-bit platform will be armv= 7<br> >> as I understand.)<br> <br> Looks like I should have done a wider exploration instead<br> of presuming just main-armv7 was broken.<br> <br> An interesting point is that none of the *-armv7-quarterly<br> jails have failed so far. Just the *-armv7-default have<br> failed:<br> <br> main-armv7-default p149fe86b8e79_s149e1af6a ,<br> 141releng-armv7-default 1f84c1fae602 ,<br> 133releng-armv7-default 1f84c1fae602 .<br> <br> I'll note that the arm64 ones did not fail:<br> <br> main-arm64-default p149fe86b8e79_s149e1af6ae4<br> 141arm64-default 1f84c1fae602 ,<br> 133arm64-default 1f84c1fae602 .<br> <br> 133releng-armv7-default is the oldest failure for this issue:<br> Sun, 06 Oct 2024 23:33:31 GMT start with elapsed: 00:05:26 .<br> <br> 133releng-armv7-default had a prior build: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:55:19 = GMT 58:03:54<br> <br> 141releng-armv7-default had no prior build attempts ( was: 140releng-armv7-= default ).<br> <br> main-armv7-default had a prior build: T= hu, 03 Oct 2024 04:21:42 GMT 61:50:05<br> <br> <br> I wonder what a common change is across the failing examples.<br> <br> <br> =3D=3D=3D<br> Mark Millard<br> marklmi at yahoo.com<br> <br> </philip@freebsd.org></freebsd-arm@freebsd.org></freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>= </antoine@freebsd.org></marklmi@yahoo.com></ronald-lists@klop.ws></div><!--= TextPlainViewer --> <hr> </div><!-- MessageRFC822Viewer --> </blockquote><br><br><br></div></body></html> ------=_Part_49318_2106664272.1729630346910--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1902543396.49319.1729630346915>