From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Feb 19 21:46:47 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from intranet.ru (tcms8.intranet.ru [212.164.0.135])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D2437B400
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [195.151.139.2] (account <replicator@ngs.ru>)
  by intranet.ru (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.4.8)
  with HTTP id 9970027 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:46:36 +0600
From: "Eugene Panchenko" <replicator@ngs.ru>
Subject: Task activation delays: FreeBSD versus Linux?
To: hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.4.8
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:46:36 +0600
Message-ID: <web-9970027@intranet.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

gretings.

As seen on kerneltrap.org:
---
Andrew Morton: Ingo Molnar broke the ground here with his
2.2.12 patch which demonstrated that Linux could fairly
easily yield task activation delays which are one to two
orders of magnitude better than any competing operating
system. 
---

is this a truth ? about "orders of magnitude" ? does FreeBSD
fall under "any competing operating system"?

thankyou
____________________________________________________________
Сделайте себе подарок - http://ngs.ru/tovar





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message