From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov 28 11:26:26 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA27835
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:26:26 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA27825
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:26:21 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA01588; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:25:28 -0800
To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey)
cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers)
Subject: Re: Documentation.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Nov 1995 19:05:02 +0100."
             <199511281805.TAA27256@allegro.lemis.de> 
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:25:28 -0800
Message-ID: <1586.817586728@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
> > 
> > > locking as the result of the change of struct flock.  The binary I had
> > > (elm) was compiled on BSD/386 1.1, and it didn't run on BSD/OS 2.0
> > > either.
> > 
> > Now try compiling elm on BSD/OS 2.0 and running that under FreeBSD.  That
> > was what was referred to.
> 
> Aha.  How about that--it SIGSEGVs out of start.  Is this known behaviour?
> 
> Greg

Uh.  Greg, you really should read your mail more thoroughly.  This is
the issue you've been discussing WRT "BSDI compatibility" the whole
time.. :-)

					Jordan