From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 21 15:47:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3554F1065675 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031AD8FC19 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (m206-63.dsl.tsoft.com [198.144.206.63]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0LFl1eu059485 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:47:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Message-ID: <4D39AA80.6020609@feral.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:47:12 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: Feral Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org References: <4D38C44D.6080703@feral.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Default is to whitelist mail, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:47:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: rescan causes offlined tape to reload X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:47:02 -0000 On 1/20/2011 9:24 PM, G. Paul Ziemba wrote: > .... > # camcontrol rescan all > > Jan 20 21:08:40 hairball kernel: (probe4:sym0:0:4:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Jan 20 21:08:44 hairball kernel: (probe4:sym0:0:4:0): LOAD UNLOAD. CDB: 1b 0 0 0 3 0 > Jan 20 21:09:34 hairball kernel: sym0:4:control msgout: 80 6. > Jan 20 21:09:34 hairball kernel: (probe4:sym0:0:4:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Jan 20 21:09:34 hairball kernel: (probe4:sym0:0:4:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 Okay, you've proved that the probe code is issuing this. That's wrong. Let me chase what has happened here.