From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 27 18:06:43 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370D516A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 May 2004 18:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ints.mail.pike.ru (ints.mail.pike.ru [195.9.45.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121A843D2D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 May 2004 18:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from babolo@cicuta.babolo.ru)
Received: (qmail 83116 invoked from network); 28 May 2004 01:26:31 -0000
Received: from babolo.ru (HELO cicuta.babolo.ru) (194.58.226.160)
  by ints.mail.pike.ru with SMTP; 28 May 2004 01:26:31 -0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 1218 invoked by uid 136);
	Fri, 28 May 2004 01:06:56 -0000
X-ELM-OSV: (Our standard violations) hdr-charset=KOI8-R; no-hdr-encoding=1
In-Reply-To: <p06020410bcd7c655c0d8@[128.113.24.47]>
To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 05:06:56 +0400 (MSD)
From: "."@babolo.ru
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <1085706416.435647.1217.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
cc: Nicolas Rachinsky <list@rachinsky.de>
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Third "RFC" on on pkg-data ideas for ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 01:06:43 -0000

> At 5:26 PM +0200 5/24/04, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> >* Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> [2004-05-24 00:07 -0400]:
> >>  The third proposal is basically:
> >>      a) move most "standard" files into a new pkg-data
> >>         file, as described in previous proposals, except
> >>         for pkg-descr and "patch" files.
> >>      b) create a new directory at the root directory of
> >>         the ports collection.  That directory would be
> >>         called "Patches", and inside would be a directory
> >>         for each category.  Inside each Patches/category
> >>         directory would be a single-file for each port
> >>         in that category, where that single-file would
> >>         have all the "ports-collection patches" for the
> >>         matching port.
> >
> >I hoep I haven't missed something obvious, but what about local
> >patches and Makefile.local? Will they continue to work?
> 
> Makefile.local should work as well as it currently does.
> 
> I do agree that whatever is done, any major changes will have to
> continue to support local patches.  We haven't written any of the
> patch-processing code yet so I can't say this is implemented,
> but it is an item on our checklist of things we must do.
Local patches:
PR ports/45200

Or more correct http://free.babolo.ru/patch/ports.Mk.port.mk.patch
(part of)