From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 30 6:16:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cslab.csie.ntu.edu.tw (cslab.csie.ntu.edu.tw [140.112.30.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF6637B422 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 06:16:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from r88074@csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: from hornets (hornets.csie.ntu.edu.tw [140.112.30.134]) by cslab.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA24962 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:16:33 +0800 (CST) Message-Id: <200104301316.VAA24962@cslab.csie.ntu.edu.tw> From: "ªL­^¶W" To: "Freebsd-Hackers" Subject: write() vs aio_write() Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:15:25 +0800 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear all: Because write() use buffer cache, I want to know whether aio_write() is better than write() in FreeBSD 4.1 . Is aio_write() outperform write() ? Or any related performance comparison between the two system call ???? Thanks in advance Richard_Lin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message