Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:53:05 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer for metamail? (was Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/metamail Makefile ports/mail/metamail/files patch-ae patch-af) Message-ID: <20040218215305.GA47727@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <200402182147.i1ILlJ6L021224@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200402182147.i1ILlJ6L021224@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:47:18PM -0800, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > nectar 2004/02/18 13:47:18 PST > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > mail/metamail Makefile > mail/metamail/files patch-ae patch-af > Log: > Correct two format string vulnerabilities and two buffer overflows in > metamail (CVE names CAN-2004-0104 and CAN-2004-0104). > > Submitted by: Ulf Härnhammar <Ulf.Harnhammar.9485@student.uu.se> > > Revision Changes Path > 1.21 +1 -0 ports/mail/metamail/Makefile > 1.2 +20 -2 ports/mail/metamail/files/patch-ae > 1.2 +58 -2 ports/mail/metamail/files/patch-af You know, I'm almost certain these are not the only issues in this port. Please, will someone step forward to maintain this port and look for and correct outstanding security issues therein? I can pass on some information I have. Otherwise (if a maintainer does *not* step forward), I will mark this port FORBIDDEN. The only reason I don't do it now is because a few other ports depend upon this one :-( Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040218215305.GA47727>