From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 03:13:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FA916A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 03:13:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from buh.cameradicommercio.ro (unknown [81.196.25.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C976343D54 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 03:13:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro [192.168.0.10]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E7960A9; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:12:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost.buh.cameradicommercio.ro [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with SMTP id 72C3546; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:15:17 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:15:16 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: tm@onepost.net (Takeshi Morishima) Message-Id: <20040309131516.30eab374@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <3556-Mon08Mar2004231743-0600-tm@onepost.net> References: <6512-Sun07Mar2004191220-0600-tm@onepost.net> <20040308072911.3a8ab972@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <3556-Mon08Mar2004231743-0600-tm@onepost.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: tm@onepost.net cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net/xisp: need help for 5.x varargs.h update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:13:17 -0000 On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:17:43 -0600 tm@onepost.net (Takeshi Morishima) wrote: > > > In message "Re: net/xisp: need help for 5.x varargs.h update" > on 2004/03/08, Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes: > > > Builds and installs ok. Can't say it working :( > > Thanks. Well, I guess as long as it compiles, I probably should > submit the patch anyway. The errors appeared to be little bit > unusual, especially for kernel and forms errors. I was unable to reproduce the kernel error, so maybe it wasn't its fault. > It looks nothing > related to varargs.h patch. I don't think I can debug an issue like > this without getting a target system up and running locally, which > would take me a while to setup... > > Thanks again for your help. My pleasure. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user