From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Mar 3 12:15:11 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5378237B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [205.130.220.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7031043FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:15:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h23KF1v79344; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:15:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:15:01 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson To: Kirk McKusick Cc: Terry Lambert , Subject: Re: New getblk parameter. In-Reply-To: <200303031836.h23IafFL085350@beastie.mckusick.com> Message-ID: <20030303151319.Q72102-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ok, what about the substance of the patch? You're ok with this as well? On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Kirk McKusick wrote: > I agree that changing all the getblk calls is prefereable to > adding the getblkf wrapper. > > Kirk McKusick > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message