From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 3 09:40:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA0916A400 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.com) Received: from flpi101.prodigy.net (flpi101.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426F813C447 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.com) X-ORBL: [68.255.232.220] Received: from fedex.nphreak.local (adsl-68-255-232-220.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.255.232.220]) by flpi101.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l639NkWI016654; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 02:23:47 -0700 Received: from nawcoms-computer.local (unknown [192.168.212.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fedex.nphreak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33A439823; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 05:26:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <468A15AF.1050600@nawcom.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:23:59 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:40:04 -0000 Reminds me of a typical windows user i dealt with who saw an error about explorer.exe and how it could not "be read" and let it slide. :-P using my wicked non user friendly skillz of the damned, i personally like the concept of a simple "pebkac error" when bind refuses to start due to a named.conf setting or similar. sortof creates a challenge, an adventure to find what's causing the issue yourself. wait. i shouldn't be promoting ideas on how make things worse off on freebsd-questions. pardon this useless email. -ben Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Martin >> McCormick >> >> Then, there is the ultimate, the "Check engine." light on the >> modern car. >> > > Check engine - CEL > > >> It would be so nice if it said some indication as to >> the seriousness of the problem so that one knows whether to get >> it fixed now and maybe save $5,000 worth of repair costs or let >> it slide a few days until a better time. >> >> > > Most people take the tack that if the CEL comes on and the engine > is still running and the car still goes, that they can let it slide. > > Ted > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >