From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Dec 14 12:42:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA08208 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 12:42:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from germanium.xtalwind.net (germanium.xtalwind.net [205.160.242.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA08197 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 12:42:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jack@germanium.xtalwind.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.xtalwind.net [127.0.0.1]) by germanium.xtalwind.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA00218 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 15:42:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 15:42:50 -0500 (EST) From: jack To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: weird IP address (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Charles Mott wrote: > > Ethics have nothing to do with it. Spammers don't know the meaning of the word. > If Sanford Wallace decided to have www.cyberpromo.com point to a machine I > own, I *would* be concerned. And it wouldn't be ethical. At one point he had the FDN of one of his spam spewing boxes pointing to a berkeley.edu address, an address that I couldn't find in any bind sample files. Had it been in an example file I could have given him the benefit of the doubt and assumed it was an honest mistake. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack O'Neill Finger jacko@diamond.xtalwind.net or jack@xtalwind.net http://www.xtalwind.net/~jacko/pubpgp.html #include for my PGP key. PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67 FD 09 E9 3C 5F CC EB CD enriched, vcard, HTML messages > /dev/null --------------------------------------------------------------------------