From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 17:53:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D2D16A4CE for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:53:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.telcontar.com (mail.televoke.com [63.237.196.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6538843D1D for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:53:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@adept.org) Received: from adept.org ([10.0.100.254] RDNS failed) by mail.telcontar.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:53:56 -0800 Message-ID: <4022F3B2.10104@adept.org> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:53:54 -0800 From: Mike Hoskins Organization: Adept.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031110 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org References: <200402052039.40634@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> In-Reply-To: <200402052039.40634@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2004 01:53:56.0110 (UTC) FILETIME=[14749AE0:01C3EC54] Subject: Re: switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 01:53:59 -0000 net CC removed... Mikhail Teterin wrote: > So, back to the original question -- am I likely to have to any problems > with natd and ipfw dealing with this non-Ethernet interface -- assuming > en-driver attaches to this card at all? wait, why not just take the ethernet cable from the inside interface on your existing modem, connect it to a 2nd 'outside' NIC on your BSD box with a driver that's known to work, and save $100+ on a new modem? you mentioned "cabling inconvenience" before, but i don't see enough inconvenience to warrant > $100 expenditure. maybe i missed something, wouldn't be the first time... but i'm doing DSL with ipfw/natd at home using multiple NICs (outside, inside, wireless)... and it works well.